Earnings & efficiency · Versioned metric research
Unadjusted YTD efficiency ratio
Consolidated income statement; unadjusted regulatory ratio. Matching calendar year-to-date numerator and denominator. Source evidence: metric-source-contract-validation.json SHA256 38fdaa264d855efba9eacd852269d1d5ed33a76f4620c7726d21828dfb5e9a7d Open official FFIEC instructions ↗
In plain English
Unadjusted YTD efficiency ratio: what it shows
Noninterest expense (salaries, occupancy, technology and other overhead) divided by revenue, where revenue is net interest income plus noninterest income. This version is unadjusted and year-to-date.
Where reporting institutions stand now
As of Q2 2026, 4,271 banks reported a verified value for unadjusted ytd efficiency ratio. The median was 62.4%, the middle half of them fell between 53.6% and 72.9%, and the range from the 10th to the 90th percentile ran 45.7% to 84.5%.
Over the last four quarters the median moved from 57.4% in Q2 2025 to 62.4%, up 5.04 percentage points.
Across the 42 quarters on record, from Q1 2016, the median has ranged from 55.3% (Q1 2019) to 62.4% (Q2 2026).
Why it matters
It shows how much of each revenue dollar goes to running the bank before credit losses and taxes. It is the most used single measure of operating cost discipline.
How to read it
Analysts usually read a lower ratio as less overhead per dollar of revenue. Compare with banks of a similar business model, because banks with large wealth, trust or payments businesses carry different cost structures.
What to watch for
The figure accumulates through the calendar year, so compare a quarter with the same quarter of other years, not with the previous quarter. It is not adjusted for securities gains, intangible amortization or one-time items.
Common questions
- Is a higher value better?
- Higher or lower is not good or bad on its own: it depends on the bank's business model, size and market, so compare a bank with similar institutions.
- Why can the efficiency ratio jump between quarters?
- Because it is built from year-to-date totals, the first quarter reflects three months and later quarters reflect more. One-time revenue or expense items also move it, which is why comparing the same quarter across years is cleaner.
- How often does this metric update?
- Quarterly. Banks file Call Reports about 30 days after each quarter ends, and the figures here update when that data is loaded.
Calculation contract
RI 4093 / (4074 + 4079)
Source schedule: RI
Null policy: abstain if missing
Effective: 2016-03-31 to 2026-06-30
Definition history
Earlier versions of this metric
Each version is a distinct, dated definition — values are never silently recomputed under an older definition.
- v2 · 2016-03-31 to 2026-06-30
RI 4093 / (4074 + 4079)Null policy: abstain if missing- v1 · 2016-01-01 to superseded
RI 4093 / (RI 4074 + RI 4079)Null policy: abstain if missing
Percentiles describe position, not merit.
P10 through P90 below mark where 4271 banks' reported unadjusted ytd efficiency ratio values fell for 2026-06-30 — the median (P50) splits that group in half; it is not a target. The trend chart above follows that median quarter to quarter, and the distribution chart traces the full P10–P90 band. A higher or lower reported value is not labeled favorable or unfavorable here — that depends on the metric, the institution's business model, and context this page does not assert.
Accessible line chart
Unadjusted YTD efficiency ratio — covered-bank median
View chart data as a table
| Period | Value | Revision | Event |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-09-30 | 60.978 percent | No marker | None |
| 2016-12-31 | 61.355 percent | No marker | None |
| 2017-03-31 | 62.007 percent | No marker | None |
| 2017-06-30 | 60.487 percent | No marker | None |
| 2017-09-30 | 59.937 percent | No marker | None |
| 2017-12-31 | 60.45 percent | No marker | None |
| 2018-03-31 | 58.694 percent | No marker | None |
| 2018-06-30 | 58.311 percent | No marker | None |
| 2018-09-30 | 58.131 percent | No marker | None |
| 2018-12-31 | 57.623 percent | No marker | None |
| 2019-03-31 | 55.283 percent | No marker | None |
| 2019-06-30 | 55.284 percent | No marker | None |
| 2019-09-30 | 55.691 percent | No marker | None |
| 2019-12-31 | 56.282 percent | No marker | None |
| 2020-03-31 | 58.135 percent | No marker | None |
| 2020-06-30 | 57.647 percent | No marker | None |
| 2020-09-30 | 57.182 percent | No marker | None |
| 2020-12-31 | 58.449 percent | No marker | None |
| 2021-03-31 | 57.188 percent | No marker | None |
| 2021-06-30 | 57.484 percent | No marker | None |
| 2021-09-30 | 57.405 percent | No marker | None |
| 2021-12-31 | 58.133 percent | No marker | None |
| 2022-03-31 | 58.53 percent | No marker | None |
| 2022-06-30 | 57.716 percent | No marker | None |
| 2022-09-30 | 55.84 percent | No marker | None |
| 2022-12-31 | 55.311 percent | No marker | None |
| 2023-03-31 | 56.061 percent | No marker | None |
| 2023-06-30 | 56.549 percent | No marker | None |
| 2023-09-30 | 56.606 percent | No marker | None |
| 2023-12-31 | 58.772 percent | No marker | None |
| 2024-03-31 | 60.322 percent | No marker | None |
| 2024-06-30 | 58.781 percent | No marker | None |
| 2024-09-30 | 59.099 percent | No marker | None |
| 2024-12-31 | 58.792 percent | No marker | None |
| 2025-03-31 | 58.199 percent | No marker | None |
| 2025-06-30 | 57.402 percent | No marker | None |
| 2025-09-30 | 60.535 percent | No marker | None |
| 2025-12-31 | 60.137 percent | No marker | None |
| 2026-03-31 | 59.602 percent | No marker | None |
| 2026-06-30 | 62.444 percent | No marker | None |
Source: FFIEC Call Reports; OptimaYield versioned semantic layer. Color is supplemented by shape and labels; reduced-motion users receive no chart animation.
Historical distribution
Unadjusted YTD efficiency ratio across covered banks
Median with interquartile and P10–P90 ranges across verified observations.
View distribution data as a table
| Period | Population | P10 | P25 | Median | P75 | P90 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | 4,271 | 45.66% | 53.62% | 62.44% | 72.95% | 84.51% |
| 2026-03-31 | 1,042 | 43.38% | 51.74% | 59.60% | 68.28% | 77.62% |
| 2025-12-31 | 1,045 | 44.36% | 52.82% | 60.14% | 68.77% | 77.61% |
| 2025-09-30 | 1,041 | 43.94% | 52.89% | 60.54% | 69.31% | 78.03% |
| 2025-06-30 | 152 | 35.85% | 50.80% | 57.40% | 64.00% | 71.08% |
| 2025-03-31 | 155 | 35.73% | 51.25% | 58.20% | 64.50% | 70.41% |
| 2024-12-31 | 155 | 34.35% | 52.79% | 58.79% | 65.24% | 75.93% |
| 2024-09-30 | 155 | 34.87% | 52.60% | 59.10% | 65.98% | 74.99% |
| 2024-06-30 | 154 | 33.73% | 53.30% | 58.78% | 66.57% | 76.28% |
| 2024-03-31 | 155 | 33.27% | 53.56% | 60.32% | 67.38% | 76.63% |
| 2023-12-31 | 155 | 35.86% | 52.52% | 58.77% | 66.39% | 75.36% |
| 2023-09-30 | 153 | 33.57% | 49.53% | 56.61% | 62.88% | 70.93% |
| 2023-06-30 | 154 | 33.80% | 49.59% | 56.55% | 62.89% | 72.37% |
| 2023-03-31 | 156 | 33.64% | 49.81% | 56.06% | 62.83% | 73.24% |
| 2022-12-31 | 154 | 35.99% | 47.22% | 55.31% | 60.93% | 69.02% |
| 2022-09-30 | 155 | 35.57% | 47.10% | 55.84% | 61.77% | 70.91% |
| 2022-06-30 | 156 | 35.95% | 47.48% | 57.72% | 64.22% | 71.39% |
| 2022-03-31 | 158 | 37.35% | 49.52% | 58.53% | 66.99% | 76.06% |
| 2021-12-31 | 160 | 37.19% | 48.54% | 58.13% | 63.89% | 70.58% |
| 2021-09-30 | 162 | 37.14% | 48.55% | 57.40% | 63.05% | 70.55% |
| 2021-06-30 | 160 | 37.02% | 48.83% | 57.48% | 63.14% | 70.41% |
| 2021-03-31 | 155 | 37.81% | 48.85% | 57.19% | 63.35% | 70.46% |
| 2020-12-31 | 149 | 37.52% | 48.95% | 58.45% | 66.07% | 76.81% |
| 2020-09-30 | 148 | 37.45% | 47.94% | 57.18% | 64.14% | 74.68% |
| 2020-06-30 | 145 | 35.86% | 49.42% | 57.65% | 64.13% | 74.22% |
| 2020-03-31 | 139 | 38.73% | 50.47% | 58.14% | 67.25% | 75.41% |
| 2019-12-31 | 139 | 37.79% | 48.69% | 56.28% | 63.27% | 70.79% |
| 2019-09-30 | 141 | 37.65% | 47.94% | 55.69% | 63.07% | 69.38% |
| 2019-06-30 | 140 | 37.73% | 48.03% | 55.28% | 62.50% | 69.57% |
| 2019-03-31 | 139 | 34.63% | 46.30% | 55.28% | 63.20% | 69.94% |
| 2018-12-31 | 136 | 37.61% | 48.95% | 57.62% | 63.07% | 68.70% |
| 2018-09-30 | 137 | 38.23% | 48.69% | 58.13% | 62.73% | 68.56% |
| 2018-06-30 | 133 | 40.43% | 48.95% | 58.31% | 64.13% | 68.93% |
| 2018-03-31 | 131 | 40.83% | 50.16% | 58.69% | 65.39% | 68.46% |
| 2017-12-31 | 121 | 36.05% | 49.88% | 60.45% | 65.50% | 72.11% |
| 2017-09-30 | 123 | 38.06% | 49.94% | 59.94% | 65.04% | 70.56% |
| 2017-06-30 | 118 | 36.75% | 48.51% | 60.49% | 65.79% | 70.73% |
| 2017-03-31 | 115 | 35.62% | 49.45% | 62.01% | 67.00% | 72.71% |
| 2016-12-31 | 111 | 35.93% | 51.07% | 61.35% | 67.64% | 72.09% |
| 2016-09-30 | 111 | 36.67% | 51.93% | 60.98% | 67.83% | 72.23% |
Source: FFIEC Call Reports; OptimaYield versioned semantic layer. Population can change with filings, failures, mergers and eligibility. Missing values are excluded, never converted to zero.
Current distribution
Percentile history
Percentiles exclude unavailable values; they do not convert missing observations to zero.
| Period | Population | P10 | P25 | Median | P75 | P90 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | 4271 | 45.66% | 53.62% | 62.44% | 72.95% | 84.51% |
| 2026-03-31 | 1042 | 43.38% | 51.74% | 59.60% | 68.28% | 77.62% |
| 2025-12-31 | 1045 | 44.36% | 52.82% | 60.14% | 68.77% | 77.61% |
| 2025-09-30 | 1041 | 43.94% | 52.89% | 60.54% | 69.31% | 78.03% |
| 2025-06-30 | 152 | 35.85% | 50.80% | 57.40% | 64.00% | 71.08% |
| 2025-03-31 | 155 | 35.73% | 51.25% | 58.20% | 64.50% | 70.41% |
| 2024-12-31 | 155 | 34.35% | 52.79% | 58.79% | 65.24% | 75.93% |
| 2024-09-30 | 155 | 34.87% | 52.60% | 59.10% | 65.98% | 74.99% |
| 2024-06-30 | 154 | 33.73% | 53.30% | 58.78% | 66.57% | 76.28% |
| 2024-03-31 | 155 | 33.27% | 53.56% | 60.32% | 67.38% | 76.63% |
| 2023-12-31 | 155 | 35.86% | 52.52% | 58.77% | 66.39% | 75.36% |
| 2023-09-30 | 153 | 33.57% | 49.53% | 56.61% | 62.88% | 70.93% |
| 2023-06-30 | 154 | 33.80% | 49.59% | 56.55% | 62.89% | 72.37% |
| 2023-03-31 | 156 | 33.64% | 49.81% | 56.06% | 62.83% | 73.24% |
| 2022-12-31 | 154 | 35.99% | 47.22% | 55.31% | 60.93% | 69.02% |
| 2022-09-30 | 155 | 35.57% | 47.10% | 55.84% | 61.77% | 70.91% |
| 2022-06-30 | 156 | 35.95% | 47.48% | 57.72% | 64.22% | 71.39% |
| 2022-03-31 | 158 | 37.35% | 49.52% | 58.53% | 66.99% | 76.06% |
| 2021-12-31 | 160 | 37.19% | 48.54% | 58.13% | 63.89% | 70.58% |
| 2021-09-30 | 162 | 37.14% | 48.55% | 57.40% | 63.05% | 70.55% |
| 2021-06-30 | 160 | 37.02% | 48.83% | 57.48% | 63.14% | 70.41% |
| 2021-03-31 | 155 | 37.81% | 48.85% | 57.19% | 63.35% | 70.46% |
| 2020-12-31 | 149 | 37.52% | 48.95% | 58.45% | 66.07% | 76.81% |
| 2020-09-30 | 148 | 37.45% | 47.94% | 57.18% | 64.14% | 74.68% |
| 2020-06-30 | 145 | 35.86% | 49.42% | 57.65% | 64.13% | 74.22% |
| 2020-03-31 | 139 | 38.73% | 50.47% | 58.14% | 67.25% | 75.41% |
| 2019-12-31 | 139 | 37.79% | 48.69% | 56.28% | 63.27% | 70.79% |
| 2019-09-30 | 141 | 37.65% | 47.94% | 55.69% | 63.07% | 69.38% |
| 2019-06-30 | 140 | 37.73% | 48.03% | 55.28% | 62.50% | 69.57% |
| 2019-03-31 | 139 | 34.63% | 46.30% | 55.28% | 63.20% | 69.94% |
| 2018-12-31 | 136 | 37.61% | 48.95% | 57.62% | 63.07% | 68.70% |
| 2018-09-30 | 137 | 38.23% | 48.69% | 58.13% | 62.73% | 68.56% |
| 2018-06-30 | 133 | 40.43% | 48.95% | 58.31% | 64.13% | 68.93% |
| 2018-03-31 | 131 | 40.83% | 50.16% | 58.69% | 65.39% | 68.46% |
| 2017-12-31 | 121 | 36.05% | 49.88% | 60.45% | 65.50% | 72.11% |
| 2017-09-30 | 123 | 38.06% | 49.94% | 59.94% | 65.04% | 70.56% |
| 2017-06-30 | 118 | 36.75% | 48.51% | 60.49% | 65.79% | 70.73% |
| 2017-03-31 | 115 | 35.62% | 49.45% | 62.01% | 67.00% | 72.71% |
| 2016-12-31 | 111 | 35.93% | 51.07% | 61.35% | 67.64% | 72.09% |
| 2016-09-30 | 111 | 36.67% | 51.93% | 60.98% | 67.83% | 72.23% |
| 2016-06-30 | 109 | 37.93% | 53.20% | 61.85% | 69.07% | 73.65% |
| 2016-03-31 | 107 | 36.19% | 53.15% | 62.21% | 69.47% | 73.89% |
Institution drilldown
Highest reported values
- #1HOUSTON BANK&TRUST9840.95%
- #2PORTRAIT BANK8077.42%
- #3ECHELON BANK2359.41%
- #4LIBERTY BANK INC2281.08%
- #5IRACE DIGITAL BANK NA1782.92%
- #6GENERATIONS COMMUNITY BANK1115.29%
- #7ALVAREZ&MARSAL TRUST CO NA794.94%
- #842 NORTH PRIVATE BANK481.58%
- #9FIVE RIVERS BANK464.46%
- #10YOUNG AMERICANS BANK455.47%
Institution drilldown
Lowest reported values
- #4262GREENE CNTY COMMERCIAL BANK10.91%
- #4263ITS BANK10.23%
- #4264AMERIPRISE BANK FSB10.07%
- #4265BEAL BANK USA6.02%
- #4266U S BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSN4.80%
- #4267WELLS FARGO TRUST CO NA3.88%
- #4268WSB MUNICIPAL BANK2.19%
- #4269JPMORGAN CHASE BANK DEARBORN0.15%
- #4270NANO BANC-5.47%
- #4271BMO HARRIS CENTRAL NA-700.00%
Institution discovery
Search verified rankings by quarter
4,271 matched institutions · selected period 2026-06-30
| Rank | Institution | FDIC | Value | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | HOUSTON BANK&TRUST | 59360 | 9840.95% | P100 |
| #2 | PORTRAIT BANK | 59381 | 8077.42% | P100 |
| #3 | ECHELON BANK | 59377 | 2359.41% | P100 |
| #4 | LIBERTY BANK INC | 26816 | 2281.08% | P100 |
| #5 | IRACE DIGITAL BANK NA | 59366 | 1782.92% | P100 |
| #6 | GENERATIONS COMMUNITY BANK | 59365 | 1115.29% | P100 |
| #7 | ALVAREZ&MARSAL TRUST CO NA | 59395 | 794.94% | P100 |
| #8 | 42 NORTH PRIVATE BANK | 27015 | 481.58% | P100 |
| #9 | FIVE RIVERS BANK | 59345 | 464.46% | P100 |
| #10 | YOUNG AMERICANS BANK | 27010 | 455.47% | P100 |
| #11 | BATTLE BANK NATIONAL ASSN | 9336 | 393.73% | P100 |
| #12 | M C BANK&TRUST CO | 17388 | 309.29% | P100 |
| #13 | BANK OF LUMBER CITY | 16281 | 293.75% | P100 |
| #14 | EASTERN NATIONAL BANK | 20026 | 270.10% | P100 |
| #15 | LINEAGE BANK | 6100 | 260.32% | P100 |
| #16 | LAMONT BANK OF ST JOHN | 8681 | 257.56% | P100 |
| #17 | SOLUTIONS PLUS BANK | 59362 | 255.37% | P100 |
| #18 | ALTOS BANK | 59339 | 253.85% | P100 |
| #19 | SUMMIT NATIONAL BANK | 25054 | 233.09% | P100 |
| #20 | FORTUNA BANK | 59330 | 225.06% | P100 |
| #21 | BANK47 | 32968 | 224.23% | P100 |
| #22 | EREBOR BANK N A | 59378 | 211.95% | P100 |
| #23 | OLD GLORY BANK | 18924 | 210.34% | P99 |
| #24 | BESSEMER TR CO OF CA NA | 35413 | 206.51% | P99 |
| #25 | PIONEER FS&LA | 29517 | 193.32% | P99 |
| #26 | MAXWELL STATE BANK | 15930 | 188.73% | P99 |
| #27 | TIOGA-FRANKLIN SAVINGS BANK | 33802 | 188.70% | P99 |
| #28 | BESSEMER TR CO OF NEVADA NA | 59346 | 181.37% | P99 |
| #29 | MIDLAND FS&LA | 29980 | 179.26% | P99 |
| #30 | COLUMBIA SAVINGS&LOAN ASSN | 28480 | 176.02% | P99 |
| #31 | CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY BANK | 59379 | 171.43% | P99 |
| #32 | GRAND RIVERS COMMUNITY BANK | 10816 | 169.39% | P99 |
| #33 | AMERICAN TRUST&SAVINGS BANK | 10120 | 164.63% | P99 |
| #34 | PIERMONT BANK | 59154 | 159.07% | P99 |
| #35 | BHM BANK | 35314 | 157.87% | P99 |
| #36 | GALA BANK | 59358 | 157.30% | P99 |
| #37 | VIDALIA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK | 29772 | 155.70% | P99 |
| #38 | CONNECT COMMUNITY BANK | 28266 | 153.48% | P99 |
| #39 | SUMMIT BANK | 23864 | 152.65% | P99 |
| #40 | ADIRONDACK BANK | 28380 | 151.25% | P99 |
| #41 | PARAMOUNT BANK | 57884 | 148.35% | P99 |
| #42 | HOME SAVINGS BANK FSB | 31723 | 147.56% | P99 |
| #43 | TRANSPECOS BANKS SSB | 11178 | 146.40% | P99 |
| #44 | LEGACY BANK | 59204 | 142.44% | P99 |
| #45 | CITIZENS NB OF HAMMOND | 14820 | 142.25% | P99 |
| #46 | EUREKA HOMESTEAD | 29268 | 141.28% | P99 |
| #47 | CHAMPION BANK | 57031 | 140.64% | P99 |
| #48 | UNIBANK | 58407 | 139.29% | P99 |
| #49 | VARO BANK NATIONAL ASSN | 59190 | 138.16% | P99 |
| #50 | THRIVENT BANK | 59286 | 135.46% | P99 |
Related metrics
Other definitions from the same schedule or domain
Grouped by shared source schedule where derivable, otherwise by the same analytical domain — not a claim of statistical correlation.
Reported values and deterministic derived observations are research inputs, not ratings or predictions. Cohort composition changes over time; use peer reports for a controlled cohort comparison.