Regulatory profile
Pine Bluff, AR · FDIC certificate #3890 · RSSD 663245
Performance workbook
Open the interactive workbook to compare reported quarterly history with national, asset-band and state peers.
Peer interpretation
$10B–$50B asset cohort · 112 institutions
Deterministic peer comparison, not a regulatory rating or diagnosis. “Opportunity” means lower favorable percentile within this asset cohort.
Reported performance
Period-matched peer context
Percentiles use 107 verified constituents for the same filing period.
Ten-year database
| Quarter | Assets | Deposits | Net loans | ROA | ROE | NIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | $24.7B | $19.9B | $17.8B | 1.21% | 9.24% | 3.85% |
| 2026-03-31 | $24.6B | $20.4B | $17.7B | 1.24% | 9.54% | 3.85% |
| 2025-12-31 | $24.5B | $20.7B | $17.3B | -1.40% | -10.61% | 3.35% |
| 2025-09-30 | $24.2B | $20.7B | $16.9B | -2.28% | -17.21% | 3.21% |
| 2025-06-30 | $26.6B | $22.1B | $16.9B | 0.79% | 5.94% | 3.00% |
| 2025-03-31 | $26.7B | $22.0B | $16.9B | 0.64% | 4.78% | 2.92% |
| 2024-12-31 | $26.8B | $22.2B | $16.8B | 0.70% | 5.35% | 2.78% |
| 2024-09-30 | $27.2B | $22.2B | $17.1B | 0.65% | 5.00% | 2.72% |
| 2024-06-30 | $27.3B | $22.1B | $17.0B | 0.73% | 5.68% | 2.69% |
| 2024-03-31 | $27.3B | $22.5B | $16.8B | 0.73% | 5.61% | 2.67% |
| 2023-12-31 | $27.3B | $22.4B | $16.6B | 0.75% | 5.90% | 2.80% |
| 2023-09-30 | $27.5B | $22.4B | $16.6B | 0.84% | 6.71% | 2.82% |
| 2023-06-30 | $27.9B | $22.6B | $16.6B | 0.87% | 6.90% | 2.91% |
| 2023-03-31 | $27.5B | $22.6B | $16.4B | 0.78% | 6.16% | 3.03% |
| 2022-12-31 | $27.4B | $22.7B | $15.9B | 1.11% | 8.64% | 3.20% |
| 2022-09-30 | $27.0B | $22.2B | $15.4B | 1.02% | 7.90% | 3.16% |
| 2022-06-30 | $27.2B | $22.2B | $14.9B | 0.87% | 6.67% | 3.03% |
| 2022-03-31 | $24.4B | $19.6B | $11.9B | 1.18% | 8.86% | 2.76% |
| 2021-12-31 | $24.7B | $19.6B | $11.8B | 1.29% | 9.46% | 2.93% |
| 2021-09-30 | $23.2B | $18.3B | $10.7B | 1.41% | 10.41% | 2.94% |
| 2021-06-30 | $23.4B | $18.5B | $11.2B | 1.36% | 10.04% | 2.95% |
| 2021-03-31 | $23.3B | $18.4B | $12.0B | 1.31% | 9.61% | 2.97% |
| 2020-12-31 | $22.3B | $17.2B | $12.8B | 1.30% | 8.92% | 3.48% |
| 2020-09-30 | $21.4B | $16.4B | $14.0B | 1.39% | 9.42% | 3.55% |
| 2020-06-30 | $21.9B | $16.8B | $14.5B | 1.41% | 9.54% | 3.64% |
| 2020-03-31 | $20.8B | $15.7B | $14.3B | 1.62% | 10.71% | 3.74% |
| 2019-12-31 | $17.7B | $13.1B | $12.7B | 1.51% | 9.90% | 3.98% |
| 2019-09-30 | $17.7B | $13.6B | $13.0B | 1.53% | 10.20% | 3.99% |
| 2019-06-30 | $17.9B | $13.6B | $13.1B | 1.40% | 9.40% | 3.98% |
| 2019-03-31 | $16.1B | $12.2B | $11.7B | 1.33% | 9.02% | 3.92% |
| 2018-12-31 | $16.5B | $12.6B | $11.7B | 1.48% | 10.22% | 4.07% |
| 2018-09-30 | $16.3B | $12.3B | $11.9B | 1.47% | 10.14% | 4.12% |
| 2018-06-30 | $16.1B | $12.2B | $11.4B | 1.46% | 9.97% | 4.10% |
| 2018-03-31 | $12.7B | $9.8B | $8.8B | 1.44% | 10.12% | 4.02% |
| 2017-12-31 | $9.4B | $7.2B | $6.3B | 1.01% | 7.57% | 3.87% |
| 2017-09-30 | $9.5B | $7.4B | $6.3B | 1.22% | 9.20% | 3.85% |
| 2017-06-30 | $8.6B | $6.8B | $5.9B | 1.19% | 8.82% | 3.98% |
| 2017-03-31 | $8.6B | $6.9B | $5.7B | 1.17% | 8.73% | 3.94% |
| 2016-12-31 | $8.4B | $6.8B | $5.6B | 1.32% | 9.59% | 3.96% |
| 2016-09-30 | $7.7B | $6.2B | $5.1B | 1.37% | 9.79% | 4.18% |
| 2016-06-30 | $7.5B | $6.1B | $5.0B | 1.36% | 9.76% | 4.24% |
| 2016-03-31 | $7.5B | $6.2B | $4.9B | 1.37% | 9.89% | 4.37% |
Ownership, transformations and revisions
NIC relationships are time-bounded. Reviewed filing revisions remain distinct from mergers.
SIMMONS FIRST NATIONAL CORPORATIONRSSD 1094828 · 1984-12-31 to current
SIMMONS FIRST NATIONAL CORPORATIONRSSD 1094828 · 1970-12-31 to 1984-12-30
2022-04-09RSSD 260868 → 663245 · code 1
2021-10-09RSSD 2758024 → 663245 · code 1
2021-10-09RSSD 3395293 → 663245 · code 1
2020-02-15RSSD 103255 → 663245 · code 1
2019-04-13RSSD 2769589 → 663245 · code 1
2018-05-29RSSD 398350 → 663245 · code 1
No reviewed revisions published.
Latest registered batch · retrieved 8/27/2026, 10:51:00 AM · SHA-256 56519b9e6ae2ada5757ec111f52c6451d5e31d6d47a52fdcf0bf38acf129fcaa · source ↗
Put it in context
Use consistent definitions, then verify material findings against the official filing.