Loading bank profile
Regulatory profile
Jackson, MS · FDIC certificate #4988 · RSSD 342634
Performance workbook
Open the interactive workbook to compare reported quarterly history with national, asset-band and state peers.
Peer interpretation
$10B–$50B asset cohort · 112 institutions
Deterministic peer comparison, not a regulatory rating or diagnosis. “Opportunity” means lower favorable percentile within this asset cohort.
Reported performance
Period-matched peer context
Percentiles use 107 verified constituents for the same filing period.
Ten-year database
| Quarter | Assets | Deposits | Net loans | ROA | ROE | NIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | $19.2B | $16.2B | $14.1B | 1.33% | 11.39% | 3.84% |
| 2026-03-31 | $19.0B | $15.9B | $14.0B | 1.26% | 10.75% | 3.79% |
| 2025-12-31 | $18.9B | $15.6B | $13.8B | 1.26% | 10.90% | 3.83% |
| 2025-09-30 | $18.8B | $15.7B | $13.6B | 1.25% | 10.80% | 3.81% |
| 2025-06-30 | $18.6B | $15.2B | $13.5B | 1.24% | 10.78% | 3.78% |
| 2025-03-31 | $18.3B | $15.2B | $13.3B | 1.22% | 10.67% | 3.73% |
| 2024-12-31 | $18.2B | $15.2B | $13.1B | 1.26% | 11.94% | 3.55% |
| 2024-09-30 | $18.5B | $15.3B | $13.2B | 1.25% | 12.10% | 3.47% |
| 2024-06-30 | $18.5B | $15.5B | $13.2B | 1.29% | 12.95% | 3.33% |
| 2024-03-31 | $18.4B | $15.4B | $13.1B | 0.94% | 9.82% | 3.23% |
| 2023-12-31 | $18.7B | $15.6B | $13.0B | 0.94% | 10.34% | 3.38% |
| 2023-09-30 | $18.4B | $15.2B | $12.8B | 0.98% | 10.90% | 3.40% |
| 2023-06-30 | $18.4B | $15.0B | $12.7B | 1.08% | 12.05% | 3.40% |
| 2023-03-31 | $18.9B | $14.9B | $12.6B | 1.13% | 12.79% | 3.37% |
| 2022-12-31 | $18.0B | $14.5B | $12.2B | 0.45% | 4.62% | 3.18% |
| 2022-09-30 | $17.2B | $14.5B | $11.6B | 0.85% | 8.56% | 3.00% |
| 2022-06-30 | $16.9B | $14.8B | $11.0B | 0.77% | 7.56% | 2.73% |
| 2022-03-31 | $17.4B | $15.2B | $10.5B | 0.70% | 6.85% | 2.53% |
| 2021-12-31 | $17.6B | $15.2B | $10.5B | 0.90% | 8.43% | 2.73% |
| 2021-09-30 | $17.4B | $15.0B | $10.5B | 0.99% | 9.25% | 2.80% |
| 2021-06-30 | $17.1B | $14.8B | $10.5B | 1.22% | 11.44% | 2.94% |
| 2021-03-31 | $16.9B | $14.5B | $11.0B | 1.28% | 12.01% | 2.74% |
| 2020-12-31 | $16.5B | $14.2B | $10.8B | 1.08% | 9.43% | 3.17% |
| 2020-09-30 | $15.6B | $13.2B | $11.2B | 1.01% | 8.60% | 3.21% |
| 2020-06-30 | $15.7B | $13.5B | $10.8B | 0.78% | 6.54% | 3.26% |
| 2020-03-31 | $14.0B | $11.6B | $9.8B | 0.67% | 5.40% | 3.42% |
| 2019-12-31 | $13.5B | $11.3B | $9.5B | 1.14% | 9.20% | 3.57% |
| 2019-09-30 | $13.6B | $11.3B | $9.5B | 1.17% | 9.55% | 3.58% |
| 2019-06-30 | $13.5B | $11.6B | $9.4B | 1.15% | 9.36% | 3.56% |
| 2019-03-31 | $13.5B | $11.6B | $9.2B | 1.02% | 8.34% | 3.52% |
| 2018-12-31 | $13.3B | $11.4B | $9.0B | 1.13% | 9.36% | 3.49% |
| 2018-09-30 | $13.4B | $11.0B | $9.0B | 1.13% | 9.43% | 3.47% |
| 2018-06-30 | $13.5B | $11.1B | $9.0B | 1.15% | 9.64% | 3.43% |
| 2018-03-31 | $13.5B | $11.0B | $8.8B | 1.10% | 9.29% | 3.36% |
| 2017-12-31 | $13.8B | $10.6B | $8.9B | 0.79% | 6.75% | 3.37% |
| 2017-09-30 | $13.9B | $10.2B | $8.8B | 0.89% | 7.66% | 3.35% |
| 2017-06-30 | $13.9B | $10.4B | $8.7B | 0.83% | 7.13% | 3.33% |
| 2017-03-31 | $13.5B | $10.1B | $8.3B | 0.95% | 8.09% | 3.30% |
| 2016-12-31 | $13.4B | $10.1B | $8.2B | 0.85% | 7.11% | 3.38% |
| 2016-09-30 | $13.2B | $9.7B | $8.0B | 0.84% | 6.97% | 3.38% |
| 2016-06-30 | $13.0B | $9.5B | $7.9B | 0.78% | 6.43% | 3.38% |
| 2016-03-31 | $12.8B | $9.6B | $7.7B | 0.87% | 7.20% | 3.39% |
Ownership, transformations and revisions
NIC relationships are time-bounded. Reviewed filing revisions remain distinct from mergers.
TRUSTMARK CORPORATIONRSSD 1079562 · 1994-10-08 to current
TRUSTMARK CORPORATIONRSSD 1079562 · 1970-12-31 to 1994-10-07
2017-04-08RSSD 2753588 → 342634 · code 1
2014-01-01RSSD 437053 → 342634 · code 1
2013-02-16RSSD 576130 → 342634 · code 1
2012-03-17RSSD 509138 → 342634 · code 1
2011-04-16RSSD 633837 → 342634 · code 50
2006-08-26RSSD 2745565 → 342634 · code 1
No reviewed revisions published.
Latest registered batch · retrieved 8/27/2026, 10:51:00 AM · SHA-256 56519b9e6ae2ada5757ec111f52c6451d5e31d6d47a52fdcf0bf38acf129fcaa · source ↗
Put it in context
Use consistent definitions, then verify material findings against the official filing.