Data through Q3 2026 · 4,200 institutions
Data through Q3 2026 · 4,200 institutions

Capital · Versioned metric research

Common equity tier 1 ratio

Standardized and advanced-approaches capital frameworks. Quarter-end reported balances. Source evidence: metric-source-contract-validation.json SHA256 38fdaa264d855efba9eacd852269d1d5ed33a76f4620c7726d21828dfb5e9a7d Open official FFIEC instructions ↗

In plain English

Common equity tier 1 ratio: what it shows

Common equity tier 1 (CET1) capital divided by risk-weighted assets. CET1 is the highest-quality capital: common stock, retained earnings and certain other equity after regulatory deductions. Risk weighting counts riskier assets more heavily than safe ones.

Where reporting institutions stand now

As of Q2 2026, 2,477 banks reported a verified value for common equity tier 1 ratio. The median was 14.7%, the middle half of them fell between 12.5% and 19.0%, and the range from the 10th to the 90th percentile ran 11.2% to 28.3%.

Over the last four quarters the median moved from 13.4% in Q2 2025 to 14.7%, up 1.29 percentage points.

Across the 42 quarters on record, from Q1 2016, the median has ranged from 12.2% (Q2 2016) to 14.7% (Q2 2026).

Why it matters

It is the headline measure of how much loss a bank can absorb before its owners' money is gone and regulators step in. US rules set a 4.5% minimum, a further 2.5% capital conservation buffer, and 6.5% as one of the tests for being well capitalized under prompt corrective action.

How to read it

A bank well above the regulatory reference points has more room to absorb losses or to grow; a bank close to them has less. Compare with banks of similar size and business model, not against a single number.

What to watch for

Banks that elected the community bank leverage ratio framework do not report risk-based ratios, so only part of the universe appears here. Large banks can face extra requirements, such as stress capital buffers, that this page does not model.

Common questions

Is a higher value better?
Higher or lower is not good or bad on its own: it depends on the bank's business model, size and market, so compare a bank with similar institutions.
Why do fewer banks report a CET1 ratio than exist?
Community banks that opted into the community bank leverage ratio framework are exempt from reporting risk-based capital ratios, so they have no CET1 ratio in the Call Report. The population count on this page is the number of banks that reported a verified value.
What CET1 ratio makes a bank well capitalized?
A CET1 ratio of at least 6.5% is one of the tests for the well-capitalized category under US prompt corrective action rules; a bank must also meet the tier 1, total capital and leverage tests. The official FFIEC instructions linked on this page set out the full rules.
How often does this metric update?
Quarterly. Banks file Call Reports about 30 days after each quarter ends, and the figures here update when that data is loaded.
v3 definition42 quarters2477 current observationsRATIO unit

Calculation contract

RC-R I P859 / A223; matched standard-approach prefix, RCFW advanced-approaches fallback for the numerator

Source schedule: RCR

Null policy: abstain if missing

Effective: 2016-03-31 to 2026-06-30

How every metric is acquired, derived, and validated →

Definition history

Earlier versions of this metric

Each version is a distinct, dated definition — values are never silently recomputed under an older definition.

v2 · 2016-03-31 to 2026-06-30
RC-R I P859 / A223; matched standard-approach prefixNull policy: abstain if missing
v1 · 2016-01-01 to superseded
RC-R P859 / RC-R A223Null policy: abstain if missing
Reading this page

Percentiles describe position, not merit.

P10 through P90 below mark where 2477 banks' reported common equity tier 1 ratio values fell for 2026-06-30 — the median (P50) splits that group in half; it is not a target. The trend chart above follows that median quarter to quarter, and the distribution chart traces the full P10–P90 band. A higher or lower reported value is not labeled favorable or unfavorable here — that depends on the metric, the institution's business model, and context this page does not assert.

Accessible line chart

Common equity tier 1 ratio — covered-bank median

View chart data as a table
PeriodValueRevisionEvent
2016-09-3012.366 percentNo markerNone
2016-12-3112.364 percentNo markerNone
2017-03-3112.355 percentNo markerNone
2017-06-3012.524 percentNo markerNone
2017-09-3012.411 percentNo markerNone
2017-12-3112.262 percentNo markerNone
2018-03-3112.327 percentNo markerNone
2018-06-3012.383 percentNo markerNone
2018-09-3012.413 percentNo markerNone
2018-12-3112.41 percentNo markerNone
2019-03-3112.437 percentNo markerNone
2019-06-3012.461 percentNo markerNone
2019-09-3012.416 percentNo markerNone
2019-12-3112.334 percentNo markerNone
2020-03-3112.359 percentNo markerNone
2020-06-3012.442 percentNo markerNone
2020-09-3012.797 percentNo markerNone
2020-12-3112.92 percentNo markerNone
2021-03-3113.221 percentNo markerNone
2021-06-3013.477 percentNo markerNone
2021-09-3013.441 percentNo markerNone
2021-12-3113.261 percentNo markerNone
2022-03-3112.929 percentNo markerNone
2022-06-3012.739 percentNo markerNone
2022-09-3012.546 percentNo markerNone
2022-12-3112.535 percentNo markerNone
2023-03-3112.524 percentNo markerNone
2023-06-3012.631 percentNo markerNone
2023-09-3012.761 percentNo markerNone
2023-12-3112.942 percentNo markerNone
2024-03-3112.878 percentNo markerNone
2024-06-3013.152 percentNo markerNone
2024-09-3013.4 percentNo markerNone
2024-12-3113.412 percentNo markerNone
2025-03-3113.358 percentNo markerNone
2025-06-3013.391 percentNo markerNone
2025-09-3013.379 percentNo markerNone
2025-12-3113.355 percentNo markerNone
2026-03-3113.413 percentNo markerNone
2026-06-3014.678 percentNo markerNone

Source: FFIEC Call Reports; OptimaYield versioned semantic layer. Color is supplemented by shape and labels; reduced-motion users receive no chart animation.

Historical distribution

Common equity tier 1 ratio across covered banks

Median with interquartile and P10–P90 ranges across verified observations.

2026-06-30 latest period2,477 observations14.68% median12.54%–19.01% interquartile range
View distribution data as a table
PeriodPopulationP10P25MedianP75P90
2026-06-302,47711.24%12.54%14.68%19.01%28.32%
2026-03-3185511.11%12.04%13.41%15.44%19.25%
2025-12-3186711.04%11.93%13.35%15.37%19.12%
2025-09-3086911.03%11.90%13.38%15.46%19.23%
2025-06-3015411.47%12.19%13.39%15.60%18.02%
2025-03-3115711.63%12.24%13.36%15.70%17.94%
2024-12-3115811.58%12.28%13.41%15.81%18.07%
2024-09-3015811.46%11.96%13.40%15.47%17.77%
2024-06-3015511.33%11.83%13.15%15.28%17.90%
2024-03-3115711.09%11.74%12.88%15.69%17.77%
2023-12-3115810.90%11.81%12.94%15.38%17.78%
2023-09-3015610.82%11.62%12.76%14.91%18.27%
2023-06-3015510.81%11.38%12.63%14.67%18.02%
2023-03-3115910.66%11.14%12.52%14.63%18.65%
2022-12-3115810.58%11.22%12.54%14.84%18.56%
2022-09-3015810.36%11.18%12.55%15.14%18.42%
2022-06-3015810.38%11.33%12.74%15.05%18.16%
2022-03-3116010.64%11.78%12.93%15.07%18.15%
2021-12-3115910.86%11.79%13.26%15.99%19.66%
2021-09-3016111.01%12.22%13.44%15.53%20.43%
2021-06-3016011.21%12.26%13.48%16.11%20.28%
2021-03-3115811.19%12.07%13.22%15.55%19.96%
2020-12-3115110.90%11.76%12.92%14.90%19.68%
2020-09-3015110.75%11.70%12.80%14.94%19.49%
2020-06-3014810.60%11.33%12.44%14.69%19.34%
2020-03-3112410.40%11.27%12.36%14.30%20.51%
2019-12-3114010.62%11.32%12.33%13.86%18.32%
2019-09-3014310.51%11.38%12.42%14.03%18.10%
2019-06-3014110.61%11.32%12.46%13.97%17.97%
2019-03-3114110.72%11.36%12.44%13.74%17.65%
2018-12-3113710.57%11.12%12.41%13.66%17.59%
2018-09-3013810.67%11.33%12.41%13.90%17.35%
2018-06-3013410.65%11.23%12.38%13.91%16.93%
2018-03-3113210.64%11.23%12.33%14.06%16.78%
2017-12-3112310.43%11.19%12.26%14.04%17.51%
2017-09-3012510.62%11.11%12.41%14.40%17.79%
2017-06-3012110.50%11.12%12.52%14.70%18.02%
2017-03-3111810.57%11.13%12.36%14.55%17.74%
2016-12-3111410.40%10.84%12.36%14.54%17.41%
2016-09-3011410.39%10.83%12.37%14.02%17.44%

Source: FFIEC Call Reports; OptimaYield versioned semantic layer. Population can change with filings, failures, mergers and eligibility. Missing values are excluded, never converted to zero.

Current distribution

Percentile history

Percentiles exclude unavailable values; they do not convert missing observations to zero.

PeriodPopulationP10P25MedianP75P90
2026-06-30247711.24%12.54%14.68%19.01%28.32%
2026-03-3185511.11%12.04%13.41%15.44%19.25%
2025-12-3186711.04%11.93%13.35%15.37%19.12%
2025-09-3086911.03%11.90%13.38%15.46%19.23%
2025-06-3015411.47%12.19%13.39%15.60%18.02%
2025-03-3115711.63%12.24%13.36%15.70%17.94%
2024-12-3115811.58%12.28%13.41%15.81%18.07%
2024-09-3015811.46%11.96%13.40%15.47%17.77%
2024-06-3015511.33%11.83%13.15%15.28%17.90%
2024-03-3115711.09%11.74%12.88%15.69%17.77%
2023-12-3115810.90%11.81%12.94%15.38%17.78%
2023-09-3015610.82%11.62%12.76%14.91%18.27%
2023-06-3015510.81%11.38%12.63%14.67%18.02%
2023-03-3115910.66%11.14%12.52%14.63%18.65%
2022-12-3115810.58%11.22%12.54%14.84%18.56%
2022-09-3015810.36%11.18%12.55%15.14%18.42%
2022-06-3015810.38%11.33%12.74%15.05%18.16%
2022-03-3116010.64%11.78%12.93%15.07%18.15%
2021-12-3115910.86%11.79%13.26%15.99%19.66%
2021-09-3016111.01%12.22%13.44%15.53%20.43%
2021-06-3016011.21%12.26%13.48%16.11%20.28%
2021-03-3115811.19%12.07%13.22%15.55%19.96%
2020-12-3115110.90%11.76%12.92%14.90%19.68%
2020-09-3015110.75%11.70%12.80%14.94%19.49%
2020-06-3014810.60%11.33%12.44%14.69%19.34%
2020-03-3112410.40%11.27%12.36%14.30%20.51%
2019-12-3114010.62%11.32%12.33%13.86%18.32%
2019-09-3014310.51%11.38%12.42%14.03%18.10%
2019-06-3014110.61%11.32%12.46%13.97%17.97%
2019-03-3114110.72%11.36%12.44%13.74%17.65%
2018-12-3113710.57%11.12%12.41%13.66%17.59%
2018-09-3013810.67%11.33%12.41%13.90%17.35%
2018-06-3013410.65%11.23%12.38%13.91%16.93%
2018-03-3113210.64%11.23%12.33%14.06%16.78%
2017-12-3112310.43%11.19%12.26%14.04%17.51%
2017-09-3012510.62%11.11%12.41%14.40%17.79%
2017-06-3012110.50%11.12%12.52%14.70%18.02%
2017-03-3111810.57%11.13%12.36%14.55%17.74%
2016-12-3111410.40%10.84%12.36%14.54%17.41%
2016-09-3011410.39%10.83%12.37%14.02%17.44%
2016-06-3011210.28%10.78%12.22%14.17%17.90%
2016-03-3110910.30%10.84%12.42%13.88%18.10%

Institution drilldown

Highest reported values

  1. #1PLANTE MORAN TRUST NA19186.81%
  2. #2WHEATON COLLEGE TRUST CO NA833.62%
  3. #3EVERCORE TRUST CO NA824.30%
  4. #4ADP TRUST CO NATIONAL ASSN643.42%
  5. #5JPMORGAN CHASE BANK DEARBORN507.91%
  6. #6U S BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSN488.44%
  7. #7U S BANK TRUST NA SD483.07%
  8. #8KEY NATIONAL TR CO OF DE467.81%
  9. #9WINTRUST PRIVATE TRUST CO NA459.87%
  10. #10BMO HARRIS CENTRAL NA446.89%

Institution drilldown

Lowest reported values

  1. #2468CARVER FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK9.25%
  2. #2469MILLENNIUM BANK9.22%
  3. #2470SOUTHPOINT BANK8.91%
  4. #2471UNITY NB OF HOUSTON8.54%
  5. #2472NANO BANC7.83%
  6. #2473CONNECT COMMUNITY BANK7.66%
  7. #2474COLUMBIA SAVINGS&LOAN ASSN7.62%
  8. #2475SUMMIT NATIONAL BANK4.82%
  9. #2476TIOGA-FRANKLIN SAVINGS BANK2.89%
  10. #2477LAMONT BANK OF ST JOHN2.67%

Institution discovery

Search verified rankings by quarter

2,477 matched institutions · selected period 2026-06-30

RankInstitutionFDICValuePercentile
#1PLANTE MORAN TRUST NA5741819186.81%P100
#2WHEATON COLLEGE TRUST CO NA57150833.62%P100
#3EVERCORE TRUST CO NA58927824.30%P100
#4ADP TRUST CO NATIONAL ASSN59194643.42%P100
#5JPMORGAN CHASE BANK DEARBORN21761507.91%P100
#6U S BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSN57047488.44%P100
#7U S BANK TRUST NA SD34813483.07%P100
#8KEY NATIONAL TR CO OF DE59069467.81%P100
#9WINTRUST PRIVATE TRUST CO NA35063459.87%P100
#10BMO HARRIS CENTRAL NA58216446.89%P100
#11EMIGRANT MERCANTILE BANK57834428.69%P100
#12TIAA TRUST NATIONAL ASSN59344413.34%P100
#13U S BANK TRUST CO NA34588409.95%P100
#14CREDIT FIRST NATIONAL ASSN33855400.63%P99
#15TOWNE TRUST CO NATIONAL ASSN35248360.02%P99
#16SEI PRIVATE TRUST CO35388359.17%P99
#17EDWARD JONES TRUST CO28390355.57%P99
#18ROCKEFELLER TRUST CO NA26622309.48%P99
#19NATIONAL ADVISORS TRUST CO57160294.81%P99
#20PAYCOM NATIONAL TRUST BANK59363293.19%P99
#21WELLS FARGO BANK S CNTL NA5146279.70%P99
#22WILMINGTON TRUST NA34069274.44%P99
#23IRACE DIGITAL BANK NA59366260.13%P99
#24INSPIRE TRUST CO NA59349258.61%P99
#25WELLS FARGO NB WEST27389253.98%P99
#26NEW COVENANT TRUST CO NA34732248.35%P99
#27PRIVATE TRUST CO NA34057242.64%P99
#28LEGACY TRUST CO N A57380226.62%P99
#29CANANDAIGUA NATL TR CO OF FL58999223.72%P99
#30CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY BANK59379220.54%P99
#31CIBC NATIONAL TRUST CO91325215.65%P99
#32RAYMOND JAMES TRUST NA33879215.65%P99
#33CHILTON TRUST CO NA59255210.37%P99
#34YOUNG AMERICANS BANK27010203.22%P99
#35CAPITAL BANK&TRUST CO35164202.30%P99
#36ECHELON BANK59377176.30%P99
#37EVERENCE TRUST CO57109175.57%P99
#38COLONIAL SAVINGS FA31361174.54%P99
#39NEUBERGER BERMAN TR CO DE NA59047171.89%P98
#40ASSOCIATED TRUST CO NA27102171.77%P98
#41DAVIDSON TRUST CO35510159.08%P98
#42FIRST NATIONAL TRUST CO57793153.75%P98
#43FIDELITY STATE BANK&TRUST CO10920153.07%P98
#44TRUST CO OF TOLEDO NA33239149.99%P98
#45NEUBERGER BERMAN TRUST CO NA59046147.57%P98
#46CBW BANK13959146.86%P98
#47VANGUARD NATIONAL TR CO NA57304146.81%P98
#48NATIONWIDE TRUST CO FSB34710141.82%P98
#49BANK OF JACKSON HOLE TRUST23826140.71%P98
#50MONET BANK32574135.52%P98

Related metrics

Other definitions from the same schedule or domain

Grouped by shared source schedule where derivable, otherwise by the same analytical domain — not a claim of statistical correlation.

Reported values and deterministic derived observations are research inputs, not ratings or predictions. Cohort composition changes over time; use peer reports for a controlled cohort comparison.