Loading bank profile
Regulatory profile
Los Angeles, CA · FDIC certificate #18503 · RSSD 595869
Performance workbook
Open the interactive workbook to compare reported quarterly history with national, asset-band and state peers.
Peer interpretation
$10B–$50B asset cohort · 112 institutions
Deterministic peer comparison, not a regulatory rating or diagnosis. “Opportunity” means lower favorable percentile within this asset cohort.
Reported performance
Period-matched peer context
Percentiles use 107 verified constituents for the same filing period.
Ten-year database
| Quarter | Assets | Deposits | Net loans | ROA | ROE | NIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | $24.6B | $21.1B | $20.4B | 1.55% | 12.26% | 3.48% |
| 2026-03-31 | $24.0B | $20.7B | $20.0B | 1.53% | 12.12% | 3.44% |
| 2025-12-31 | $24.2B | $20.9B | $19.9B | 1.38% | 11.03% | 3.37% |
| 2025-09-30 | $24.1B | $20.5B | $19.9B | 1.33% | 10.58% | 3.34% |
| 2025-06-30 | $23.7B | $20.0B | $19.6B | 1.34% | 10.65% | 3.30% |
| 2025-03-31 | $23.2B | $19.8B | $19.2B | 1.29% | 10.21% | 3.29% |
| 2024-12-31 | $23.0B | $19.7B | $19.2B | 1.30% | 10.54% | 3.13% |
| 2024-09-30 | $23.3B | $20.0B | $19.2B | 1.25% | 10.17% | 3.11% |
| 2024-06-30 | $23.2B | $19.8B | $19.2B | 1.30% | 10.63% | 3.09% |
| 2024-03-31 | $23.4B | $19.9B | $19.3B | 1.38% | 11.32% | 3.12% |
| 2023-12-31 | $23.1B | $19.4B | $19.4B | 1.54% | 13.03% | 3.53% |
| 2023-09-30 | $22.8B | $19.7B | $18.9B | 1.61% | 13.65% | 3.57% |
| 2023-06-30 | $23.0B | $19.1B | $18.9B | 1.63% | 13.88% | 3.60% |
| 2023-03-31 | $22.0B | $18.7B | $18.2B | 1.71% | 14.52% | 3.76% |
| 2022-12-31 | $21.9B | $18.5B | $18.1B | 1.72% | 14.56% | 3.69% |
| 2022-09-30 | $21.9B | $18.6B | $18.0B | 1.68% | 14.21% | 3.59% |
| 2022-06-30 | $21.2B | $18.3B | $17.7B | 1.56% | 13.10% | 3.42% |
| 2022-03-31 | $20.8B | $18.1B | $17.3B | 1.39% | 11.60% | 3.27% |
| 2021-12-31 | $20.9B | $18.1B | $16.2B | 1.54% | 12.04% | 3.27% |
| 2021-09-30 | $19.8B | $17.0B | $15.9B | 1.58% | 12.20% | 3.28% |
| 2021-06-30 | $19.3B | $16.6B | $15.6B | 1.62% | 12.45% | 3.25% |
| 2021-03-31 | $19.2B | $16.4B | $15.5B | 1.59% | 12.25% | 3.19% |
| 2020-12-31 | $19.0B | $16.2B | $15.5B | 1.26% | 9.77% | 3.18% |
| 2020-09-30 | $19.0B | $16.1B | $15.4B | 1.18% | 9.11% | 3.18% |
| 2020-06-30 | $19.2B | $16.3B | $15.5B | 1.13% | 8.75% | 3.20% |
| 2020-03-31 | $18.3B | $15.1B | $15.4B | 1.14% | 8.69% | 3.34% |
| 2019-12-31 | $18.1B | $14.7B | $15.0B | 1.62% | 12.19% | 3.59% |
| 2019-09-30 | $18.0B | $14.7B | $14.7B | 1.64% | 12.28% | 3.64% |
| 2019-06-30 | $17.6B | $14.4B | $14.5B | 1.63% | 12.06% | 3.66% |
| 2019-03-31 | $17.1B | $14.1B | $14.2B | 1.57% | 11.54% | 3.71% |
| 2018-12-31 | $16.8B | $13.7B | $13.9B | 1.74% | 12.79% | 3.85% |
| 2018-09-30 | $16.4B | $13.6B | $13.6B | 1.80% | 13.19% | 3.86% |
| 2018-06-30 | $16.2B | $13.2B | $13.3B | 1.82% | 13.37% | 3.82% |
| 2018-03-31 | $15.9B | $13.1B | $12.9B | 1.72% | 12.59% | 3.80% |
| 2017-12-31 | $15.6B | $12.7B | $12.8B | 1.22% | 9.18% | 3.73% |
| 2017-09-30 | $14.6B | $11.9B | $11.8B | 1.39% | 10.56% | 3.61% |
| 2017-06-30 | $14.3B | $11.5B | $11.5B | 1.44% | 10.82% | 3.51% |
| 2017-03-31 | $14.2B | $11.6B | $11.3B | 1.40% | 10.62% | 3.44% |
| 2016-12-31 | $14.5B | $11.7B | $11.1B | 1.32% | 9.88% | 3.37% |
| 2016-09-30 | $14.1B | $11.0B | $10.9B | 1.30% | 9.64% | 3.36% |
| 2016-06-30 | $13.4B | $10.5B | $10.4B | 1.27% | 9.31% | 3.40% |
| 2016-03-31 | $13.2B | $10.3B | $10.2B | 1.45% | 10.61% | 3.43% |
Ownership, transformations and revisions
NIC relationships are time-bounded. Reviewed filing revisions remain distinct from mergers.
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORPRSSD 1843080 · 1990-12-10 to current
2017-10-27RSSD 676160 → 595869 · code 1
2015-08-01RSSD 810900 → 595869 · code 1
2013-06-17RSSD 3589588 → 595869 · code 1
2007-03-31RSSD 2619572 → 595869 · code 1
2006-10-18RSSD 209139 → 595869 · code 1
2006-05-16RSSD 960609 → 595869 · code 1
No reviewed revisions published.
Latest registered batch · retrieved 8/27/2026, 10:51:00 AM · SHA-256 56519b9e6ae2ada5757ec111f52c6451d5e31d6d47a52fdcf0bf38acf129fcaa · source ↗
Put it in context
Use consistent definitions, then verify material findings against the official filing.