Regulatory profile
FDIC certificate #18503 · RSSD 595869
Recent activity
Deterministic, evidence-linked observations only — not a prediction, rating or recommendation. What counts as Notable.
Cathay Bank changed deposits by 66226 USD thousands and market share by 0.031431 points in WA
Source ↗Cathay Bank changed deposits by 3306 USD thousands and market share by -0.00651 points in Harris County, TX
Source ↗Cathay Bank changed deposits by -5238 USD thousands and market share by -0.004133 points in MD
Source ↗Cathay Bank exited the reported county market in Sussex County, NJ
Source ↗Cathay Bank changed deposits by -58508 USD thousands and market share by -0.082772 points in Queens County, NY
Source ↗Ten-year database
Branch and geographic intelligence
FDIC branch-location snapshot dated 2026-08-22
| Market | State | Locations | Main offices | Earliest establishment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Irvine | CA | 3 | 0 | Unavailable |
| San Francisco | CA | 3 | 0 | Unavailable |
| Flushing | NY | 3 | 0 | Unavailable |
| New York | NY | 3 | 0 | Unavailable |
| City Of Industry | CA | 2 | 0 | Unavailable |
| Cupertino | CA | 2 | 0 | Unavailable |
| San Jose | CA | 2 | 0 | Unavailable |
| Brooklyn | NY | 2 | 0 | Unavailable |
| Seattle | WA | 2 | 0 | Unavailable |
| Alhambra | CA | 1 | 0 | Unavailable |
| Arcadia | CA | 1 | 0 | Unavailable |
| Artesia | CA | 1 | 0 | Unavailable |
| Brea | CA | 1 | 0 | Unavailable |
| Burlingame | CA | 1 | 0 | Unavailable |
Ownership, transformations and revisions
NIC relationships are time-bounded. Reviewed filing revisions remain distinct from mergers.
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORPRSSD 1843080 · 1990-12-10 to current
Unresolved entityRSSD 6053624 · 2025-06-04 to current
Unresolved entityRSSD 5886058 · 2023-09-27 to current
Unresolved entityRSSD 5620524 · 2019-08-28 to current
Unresolved entityRSSD 5389456 · 2017-06-26 to current
Unresolved entityRSSD 5211100 · 2017-06-15 to current
Unresolved entityRSSD 3489400 · 2016-11-17 to 2020-11-30
2017-10-27RSSD 676160 → 595869 · code 1
2015-08-01RSSD 810900 → 595869 · code 1
2013-06-17RSSD 3589588 → 595869 · code 1
2007-03-31RSSD 2619572 → 595869 · code 1
2006-10-18RSSD 209139 → 595869 · code 1
2006-05-16RSSD 960609 → 595869 · code 1
No reviewed revisions published.
Latest registered batch · retrieved Aug 27, 2026, 10:51 AM UTC · SHA-256 56519b9e6ae2ada5757ec111f52c6451d5e31d6d47a52fdcf0bf38acf129fcaa · source ↗
| Quarter | Assets | Deposits | Net loans | ROA | ROE | NIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | $24.6B | $21.1B | $20.4B | 1.55% | 12.26% | 3.48% |
| 2026-03-31 | $24.0B | $20.7B | $20.0B | 1.53% | 12.12% | 3.44% |
| 2025-12-31 | $24.2B | $20.9B | $19.9B | 1.38% | 11.03% | 3.37% |
| 2025-09-30 | $24.1B | $20.5B | $19.9B | 1.33% | 10.58% | 3.34% |
| 2025-06-30 | $23.7B | $20.0B | $19.6B | 1.34% | 10.65% | 3.30% |
| 2025-03-31 | $23.2B | $19.8B | $19.2B | 1.29% | 10.21% | 3.29% |
| 2024-12-31 | $23.0B | $19.7B | $19.2B | 1.30% | 10.54% | 3.13% |
| 2024-09-30 | $23.3B | $20.0B | $19.2B | 1.25% | 10.17% | 3.11% |
| 2024-06-30 | $23.2B | $19.8B | $19.2B | 1.30% | 10.63% | 3.09% |
| 2024-03-31 | $23.4B | $19.9B | $19.3B | 1.38% | 11.32% | 3.12% |
| 2023-12-31 | $23.1B | $19.4B | $19.4B | 1.54% | 13.03% | 3.53% |
| 2023-09-30 | $22.8B | $19.7B | $18.9B | 1.61% | 13.65% | 3.57% |
| 2023-06-30 | $23.0B | $19.1B | $18.9B | 1.63% | 13.88% | 3.60% |
| 2023-03-31 | $22.0B | $18.7B | $18.2B | 1.71% | 14.52% | 3.76% |
| 2022-12-31 | $21.9B | $18.5B | $18.1B | 1.72% | 14.56% | 3.69% |
| 2022-09-30 | $21.9B | $18.6B | $18.0B | 1.68% | 14.21% | 3.59% |
| 2022-06-30 | $21.2B | $18.3B | $17.7B | 1.56% | 13.10% | 3.42% |
| 2022-03-31 | $20.8B | $18.1B | $17.3B | 1.39% | 11.60% | 3.27% |
| 2021-12-31 | $20.9B | $18.1B | $16.2B | 1.54% | 12.04% | 3.27% |
| 2021-09-30 | $19.8B | $17.0B | $15.9B | 1.58% | 12.20% | 3.28% |
| 2021-06-30 | $19.3B | $16.6B | $15.6B | 1.62% | 12.45% | 3.25% |
| 2021-03-31 | $19.2B | $16.4B | $15.5B | 1.59% | 12.25% | 3.19% |
| 2020-12-31 | $19.0B | $16.2B | $15.5B | 1.26% | 9.77% | 3.18% |
| 2020-09-30 | $19.0B | $16.1B | $15.4B | 1.18% | 9.11% | 3.18% |
| 2020-06-30 | $19.2B | $16.3B | $15.5B | 1.13% | 8.75% | 3.20% |
| 2020-03-31 | $18.3B | $15.1B | $15.4B | 1.14% | 8.69% | 3.34% |
| 2019-12-31 | $18.1B | $14.7B | $15.0B | 1.62% | 12.19% | 3.59% |
| 2019-09-30 | $18.0B | $14.7B | $14.7B | 1.64% | 12.28% | 3.64% |
| 2019-06-30 | $17.6B | $14.4B | $14.5B | 1.63% | 12.06% | 3.66% |
| 2019-03-31 | $17.1B | $14.1B | $14.2B | 1.57% | 11.54% | 3.71% |
| 2018-12-31 | $16.8B | $13.7B | $13.9B | 1.74% | 12.79% | 3.85% |
| 2018-09-30 | $16.4B | $13.6B | $13.6B | 1.80% | 13.19% | 3.86% |
| 2018-06-30 | $16.2B | $13.2B | $13.3B | 1.82% | 13.37% | 3.82% |
| 2018-03-31 | $15.9B | $13.1B | $12.9B | 1.72% | 12.59% | 3.80% |
| 2017-12-31 | $15.6B | $12.7B | $12.8B | 1.22% | 9.18% | 3.73% |
| 2017-09-30 | $14.6B | $11.9B | $11.8B | 1.39% | 10.56% | 3.61% |
| 2017-06-30 | $14.3B | $11.5B | $11.5B | 1.44% | 10.82% | 3.51% |
| 2017-03-31 | $14.2B | $11.6B | $11.3B | 1.40% | 10.62% | 3.44% |
| 2016-12-31 | $14.5B | $11.7B | $11.1B | 1.32% | 9.88% | 3.37% |
| 2016-09-30 | $14.1B | $11.0B | $10.9B | 1.30% | 9.64% | 3.36% |
| 2016-06-30 | $13.4B | $10.5B | $10.4B | 1.27% | 9.31% | 3.40% |
| 2016-03-31 | $13.2B | $10.3B | $10.2B | 1.45% | 10.61% | 3.43% |
| Daly City |
| CA |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| Unavailable |
| Diamond Bar | CA | 1 | 0 | Unavailable |
| Dublin | CA | 1 | 0 | Unavailable |
| El Monte | CA | 1 | 0 | Unavailable |
| Fountain Valley | CA | 1 | 0 | Unavailable |
| Fremont | CA | 1 | 0 | Unavailable |
Reviewed NIC structure change on 2017-10-27: RSSD 676160 → 595869 (1). The location count above reflects the current combined network and is not itself a measure of organic branch growth. 10 structure changes are on record for this entity; see History & events for the full list.
Branch locations reflect the latest registered FDIC location release, not real-time openings. Opening/closing attribution to organic growth vs. merger activity remains unavailable beyond the reviewed structure changes noted above. Annual deposit market share by state is available separately, below.
Annual FDIC Summary of Deposits, by state, as of the 2025 snapshot effective 2025-06-30. Deposits and share are as of that retained annual snapshot, not a quarterly balance — do not compare directly to Call Report deposit figures reported elsewhere on this profile.
| State | Deposits | Market share | Rank | Year over year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | $14.8B | 0.82% | 16 | Continuing · -0.04 pp |
| NY | $2B | 0.08% | 55 | Continuing · +0.00 pp |
| IL | $1.2B | 0.17% | 62 | Continuing · +0.05 pp |
| WA | $882.1M | 0.42% | 28 | Continuing · +0.03 pp |
| TX | $397.7M | 0.03% | 213 | Continuing · -0.00 pp |
| NJ | $268.8M | 0.06% | 64 | Continuing · +0.02 pp |
| NV | $112.4M | 0.09% | 37 | Continuing · -0.01 pp |
| MD | $107.6M | 0.05% | 50 | Continuing · -0.00 pp |
| MA | $98.1M | 0.02% | 110 | Continuing · -0.03 pp |
Source: FDIC Summary of Deposits, annual release. Market share divides this institution's reported branch deposits by all retained deposits in the same state for the same year — not a quarterly balance, current rate, or organic-growth attribution. Inspect year-over-year market change →
Workforce and branch productivity
2026-06-30
10b 50b asset cohort · n=107
| Period | FTE | Offices | Assets/FTE | Deposits/FTE | Deposits/office |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | 1,300 | 65 | 18,955 | 16,242 | 324,849 |
| 2026-03-31 | 1,288 | 65 | 18,661 | 16,070 | 318,430 |
| 2025-12-31 | 1,268 | 65 | 19,096 | 16,492 | 321,714 |
| 2025-09-30 | 1,264 | 65 | 19,034 | 16,250 | 315,993 |
| 2025-06-30 | 1,265 | 65 | 18,742 | 15,833 | 308,138 |
| 2025-03-31 | 1,271 | 66 | 18,245 | 15,609 | 300,588 |
| 2024-12-31 | 1,266 | 66 | 18,196 | 15,590 | 299,041 |
| 2024-09-30 | 1,242 | 66 | 18,722 | 16,088 | 302,747 |
| 2024-06-30 | 1,240 | 66 | 18,724 | 15,977 | 300,174 |
| 2024-03-31 | 1,257 | 66 | 18,604 | 15,807 | 301,057 |
| 2023-12-31 | 1,261 | 67 | 18,284 | 15,345 | 288,807 |
| 2023-09-30 | 1,266 | 67 | 18,029 | 15,529 | 293,420 |
FTE and domestic offices are official FDIC financial fields for the same quarter. Merger discontinuities and different consolidation scopes can impair comparisons; unavailable denominators remain unavailable. Peer percentiles describe the covered $10B+ asset cohort, not the full banking system.